Go back to All Blog posts

Continuous Risk Assessment: The Connecting Thread in CTEM

Amit Sheps
December 19th, 2024

In Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM), risk assessment acts as the central thread that ties all components together, turning raw threat intelligence, vulnerability detection, and external attack surface monitoring into actionable mitigation strategies. Unlike traditional threat management approaches, CTEM relies on real-time risk assessment to constantly evaluate the organization’s evolving attack surface and prioritize threats based on real-world conditions, including emerging zero-day vulnerabilities.

Key Elements of Risk Assessment in CTEM

Continuous Vulnerability Identification & Real-Time Threat Prioritization

CTEM takes a threat-centric approach to exposing potential risks within an organization’s environment. CTEM continuously identifies and evaluates vulnerabilities, focusing on zero-day threats and new weaknesses across internal and external assets.

After completing vulnerability identification, an organization will have a long list of vulnerabilities and threats that potentially require remediation. Risk assessment provides real-time prioritization based on the importance of the assets and workflows that could be negatively impacted by the threat. As a result, security teams can focus on the most pressing risks based on potential impact and likelihood of exploitation.

Adaptive Contextualization of Threats

While risk prioritization should be informed by the possible effects of a threat within an organization’s environment, this should not be the only consideration. If a threat actor is actively exploiting a vulnerability in the wild, this poses a greater real-world risk than one for which no exploit is known to exist or be in use.

Risk assessment integrates real-time threat intelligence, dynamically mapping vulnerabilities to ongoing attack campaigns. This ensures that security teams can adjust their focus instantly, responding to critical threats as they develop. Otherwise, security teams may inadvertently expand their window of vulnerability to an active threat because they were focused on addressing another one.

Components That Make CTEM Continuous

CTEM is defined by the fact that security teams are working based on an up-to-date view of their risk profile rather than a snapshot from some time in the past. To achieve this, a CTEM process needs to incorporate certain key capabilities, including:

  • Automated Threat Discovery: Automated threat discovery identifies new vulnerabilities in an organization’s environment on a continuous basis. Automation is critical because it enables constant assessment of an organization’s attack surface, something that is infeasible and unscalable with manual processes.
  • Real-Time Threat Intelligence: Threat intelligence provides current information on evolving threats. With access to real-time threat intelligence, a security team can become aware of and adapt to new threats as they emerge, minimizing their window of vulnerability.
  • Dynamic Risk Scoring: Dynamic cyber risk quantification prioritizes threats based on changing vulnerability severity and business importance. By considering both the potential impacts of the threat on the business and the likelihood of exploitation, a security team can focus its efforts where they are most likely to prevent an attack from occurring.

These components, tied together by risk assessment, ensure that CTEM operates continuously and in real time.

Business Context and Continuous Monitoring

Business Context and Prioritization

Risk assessment continuously evaluates the criticality of assets that could be affected by a particular threat. This analysis factors in their business value and the potential blast radius.

This ongoing assessment ensures that vulnerabilities with the highest potential business impact, such as those targeting customer-facing applications or financial systems, are prioritized for immediate mitigation. As a result, security teams can maximize the anticipated return on investment (ROI) of mitigation and remediation efforts.

Ongoing Monitoring and Reassessment

CTEM emphasizes continuous monitoring of the organization’s attack surface and regular reassessment of risks. This ensures that security teams stay aware of newly identified vulnerabilities, threat intelligence updates, and any changes in the external and internal environments.

By using this information for risk prioritization, the security team can respond more quickly and agilely to an emerging threat. For example, when vulnerabilities are exploited in a large-scale campaign—like the Log4j attacks—these issues can be addressed quickly to minimize the risk that the organization is among the victims of the campaign.

Actionable Responses and Continuous Learning

Actionable, Real-Time Responses

The risk assessment process in CTEM drives immediate, actionable responses to high-risk vulnerabilities. With in-depth information about the potential threat and its effects on the business, a mitigation plan is easier to develop.

As a result, organizations can automate mitigation tasks such as patching, blocking, or enforcing security controls. By doing so, they not only reduce their exposure to the threat and its effects on the business but also decrease the workload assigned to the security team.

Feedback Loop and Continuous Learning

The risk assessment process is part of a continuous feedback loop, where insights from incidents, threat intelligence, and evolving threat vectors feed back into the system. For example, an incident response team’s post-incident retrospective might determine that the root cause of an incident was a particular development practice or use of a certain library.

With this information, the organization can proactively work to improve its security and prevent future attacks. Feedback from the risk assessment process can be provided to the CTEM system, allowing it to adapt and improve its threat detection and mitigation capabilities. The organization may also take steps to provide specialized training to educate developers about a particular coding error or other risky behavior and reduce the probability of recurrence.

External Attack Surface and Business Impact

External Attack Surface Management (EASM)

CTEM relies on continuous External Attack Surface Management (EASM) to monitor internet-facing assets and third-party integrations. Risk assessment evaluates vulnerabilities in these external assets in real time, ensuring no exposure goes unnoticed and prioritizing the most critical external risks for action.

By focusing on external risks and vulnerabilities, a security team reduces the probability that an attacker will be able to gain internal access to the organization’s environment. In general, internal threats are often harder to detect and can cause more damage to the business.

Business Impact and Risk Prioritization

Risk assessments continually factor in the blast radius of potential attacks by prioritizing vulnerabilities based on their business impact. This ensures that the highest-risk vulnerabilities—those that could result in significant financial loss, regulatory penalties, or reputational damage—are mitigated first.

This differs from traditional vulnerability management, which often uses the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) score assigned to a vulnerability as the primary means of prioritizing vulnerabilities. While this score may include useful information, it doesn’t accurately assess the potential threat that a vulnerability poses to the business. For example, a critical vulnerability on an unimportant user workstation poses a lesser threat than a lower-scoring vulnerability impacting a customer-facing system or the organization’s main customer database.

Turning Information into Actionable Mitigation Strategies

In CTEM, risk assessment is the critical process that connects every component of threat management, turning information from vulnerability scanning, threat intelligence, and attack surface monitoring into actionable mitigation strategies. Without continuous and real-time risk assessment, organizations would lack the ability to effectively prioritize and respond to the most pressing threats. By continuously assessing the risk, organizations can focus their resources on mitigating the most critical vulnerabilities, protecting business-critical assets, and staying ahead of evolving threats.

IONIX offers comprehensive visibility across an organization’s entire digital attack surface with integrated real-time threat intelligence and asset-centric vulnerability prioritization. To learn more about how a threat-centric approach to risk management can benefit your organization, book a free demo with IONIX.

REQUEST A THREAT EXPOSURE REPORT TODAY

Discover the full extent of your online exposure so you can protect it.